As I follow doctors around in private clinics that treat the middle and upper class of India, I've been thinking a lot about the overall realities of healthcare in this country, the US and worldwide. I finally looked up some stats and this is what I found:
The world health organization has ranked (in 1997) the overall health system performance of 161 countries. The performance is based on quality, equity, efficiency of each countries health care system. The top 10 countries are France, Italy, San Marino, Andorra and Malta, Singapore, Spain, Oman, Austria and Japan. The United States ranks 37, Philippines 60, Mexico 61 and India 112. Take these stats for what you will, I know they are old and critics say flawed (but what research isn't?). I still think it gives a good rough estimate of where countries stand relative to each other. While I'm not surprised about the US, I am surprised that India is so far down the list!
Since I am partaking in maternal and child health program here, I thought I would relate neonatal mortality statics for a few countries. In 2011, 4/1000 neonates (birth to age 28 days) in America died. This number is the same as such countries as Canada, Brunei, Hungry, Malta, Poland, and Serbia. This is worse than some countries such as Sweden, Switzerland, Spain, Singapore, Slovenia, San Marino, Malaysia, Lithuania, Korea, Cuba, Greece, Iceland and Belgium. By comparison neonatal mortality in Mexico was 7/1000, the Philippines was 12/1000 and India was 32/1000. Myanmar has a slightly better neonatal mortality rate than India at 30/1000.
Prior to coming the India, I had heard many things regarding the abject poverty that existed. From my extremely limited point of view, it seems similar to the Philippines (which is really by best comparison), so why is the healthcare in the Philippines relatively better than India? According to the CIA (which takes data from each of the countries and makes the statement that there are vast differences between what each country constitutes poverty), the percent of people living in poverty in India (2010) was 29.8%. I have since read an article where the government claimed it was down to 22%. I also read an article stating the government will revise their definition of the poverty level to Rs 27 rural and Rs 33 for urban areas, and that 70% of Indian live on less that $2/day (currently the 68 rupees - 1 dollar). I believe you can't just convert the amount someone is making into dollars and make statements regarding their wealth without taking into account the cost of living in their country, but Rs 33/day seems very low to me. Even 136 rupees seems ridiculously low for a poverty line. By comparison, 26.5% of Filipinos in 2009 lived below the national poverty and 15.5% of Americans (2010).
I found the following maternal mortality rates via the CIA. They ranked these rates with #1 being the highest and 183 being the lowest maternal deaths. Many countries in Africa unfortunately top the list with Chad having the highest maternal mortality rates at 1100 per 100,000 births. The Philippines ranks 73 with 99 per 100,000 births, India ranks 53 with 200 per 100,000, Mexico ranks 108 with 50 per 100,000 and the US ranks 136 with 21/100,000 births. Places like Turkey, Puerto Rico, New Zealand, UAE, Kiribati, Qatar, Slovakia, Norway and the Czech Republic have fewer maternal deaths than the US. The country with the lowest mortality rate is Estonia with 2 per 100,000 births.
I am clearly not getting a complete picture of maternal and child healthcare in India from my time here. It has been wonderful observing doctors here and I have learned a lot, but I am getting a narrow slice of life that only includes those that can afford private healthcare with doctors, many of whom have studied abroad. I know part of it is the fact that I am only seeing urban healthcare, which as I have hinted at in prior posts, is FAR different than rural healthcare in India. I have read that most of the country still lives in rural areas (though urbanization abounds). If this is true, than I have not seen the healthcare of the majority of Indians. While in Northern India I was able to spend a few weeks in a more rural setting and was able to see some of the differences in the access to many of the facilities that are available in the city. I was also able to get an idea of the differences in complaints between urban and rural folk. I would be interested in spending some more time delving into these differences, trying to figure out why there is such a health disparity in this country And if I was really motivated, I probably would've already done so. But unfortunately I am not, which is not to say that I am not extremely interested in the topic.
I am also curious as to why so many people abroad think the United States is far more equitable than it really is. I was discussing the percentage of Americans in poverty, the shortage of general practitioners and the disparities of rural/urban healthcare that exist in America with the doctor I shadow and he was shocked. He was of the opinion that everyone in America got the healthcare they needed. He is not the first one to be surprised when I talk about disparities that exist in my country. One doctor was amazed when I said there is a large homeless population in Portland. What has perpetuated the idea that America is so equal abroad (I ran into the same state of mind in the Philippines)? Is it simply because it is seen as a superpower, therefore it must have it's shit together? I remember hearing many people in the Philippines talk about how America was the best country to immigrate to. Many times I wanted to tell them to do their homework and decide what is important to them (universal health care, low poverty rates, good education) before decided which country would be best.
The world health organization has ranked (in 1997) the overall health system performance of 161 countries. The performance is based on quality, equity, efficiency of each countries health care system. The top 10 countries are France, Italy, San Marino, Andorra and Malta, Singapore, Spain, Oman, Austria and Japan. The United States ranks 37, Philippines 60, Mexico 61 and India 112. Take these stats for what you will, I know they are old and critics say flawed (but what research isn't?). I still think it gives a good rough estimate of where countries stand relative to each other. While I'm not surprised about the US, I am surprised that India is so far down the list!
Since I am partaking in maternal and child health program here, I thought I would relate neonatal mortality statics for a few countries. In 2011, 4/1000 neonates (birth to age 28 days) in America died. This number is the same as such countries as Canada, Brunei, Hungry, Malta, Poland, and Serbia. This is worse than some countries such as Sweden, Switzerland, Spain, Singapore, Slovenia, San Marino, Malaysia, Lithuania, Korea, Cuba, Greece, Iceland and Belgium. By comparison neonatal mortality in Mexico was 7/1000, the Philippines was 12/1000 and India was 32/1000. Myanmar has a slightly better neonatal mortality rate than India at 30/1000.
Prior to coming the India, I had heard many things regarding the abject poverty that existed. From my extremely limited point of view, it seems similar to the Philippines (which is really by best comparison), so why is the healthcare in the Philippines relatively better than India? According to the CIA (which takes data from each of the countries and makes the statement that there are vast differences between what each country constitutes poverty), the percent of people living in poverty in India (2010) was 29.8%. I have since read an article where the government claimed it was down to 22%. I also read an article stating the government will revise their definition of the poverty level to Rs 27 rural and Rs 33 for urban areas, and that 70% of Indian live on less that $2/day (currently the 68 rupees - 1 dollar). I believe you can't just convert the amount someone is making into dollars and make statements regarding their wealth without taking into account the cost of living in their country, but Rs 33/day seems very low to me. Even 136 rupees seems ridiculously low for a poverty line. By comparison, 26.5% of Filipinos in 2009 lived below the national poverty and 15.5% of Americans (2010).
I found the following maternal mortality rates via the CIA. They ranked these rates with #1 being the highest and 183 being the lowest maternal deaths. Many countries in Africa unfortunately top the list with Chad having the highest maternal mortality rates at 1100 per 100,000 births. The Philippines ranks 73 with 99 per 100,000 births, India ranks 53 with 200 per 100,000, Mexico ranks 108 with 50 per 100,000 and the US ranks 136 with 21/100,000 births. Places like Turkey, Puerto Rico, New Zealand, UAE, Kiribati, Qatar, Slovakia, Norway and the Czech Republic have fewer maternal deaths than the US. The country with the lowest mortality rate is Estonia with 2 per 100,000 births.
I am clearly not getting a complete picture of maternal and child healthcare in India from my time here. It has been wonderful observing doctors here and I have learned a lot, but I am getting a narrow slice of life that only includes those that can afford private healthcare with doctors, many of whom have studied abroad. I know part of it is the fact that I am only seeing urban healthcare, which as I have hinted at in prior posts, is FAR different than rural healthcare in India. I have read that most of the country still lives in rural areas (though urbanization abounds). If this is true, than I have not seen the healthcare of the majority of Indians. While in Northern India I was able to spend a few weeks in a more rural setting and was able to see some of the differences in the access to many of the facilities that are available in the city. I was also able to get an idea of the differences in complaints between urban and rural folk. I would be interested in spending some more time delving into these differences, trying to figure out why there is such a health disparity in this country And if I was really motivated, I probably would've already done so. But unfortunately I am not, which is not to say that I am not extremely interested in the topic.
I am also curious as to why so many people abroad think the United States is far more equitable than it really is. I was discussing the percentage of Americans in poverty, the shortage of general practitioners and the disparities of rural/urban healthcare that exist in America with the doctor I shadow and he was shocked. He was of the opinion that everyone in America got the healthcare they needed. He is not the first one to be surprised when I talk about disparities that exist in my country. One doctor was amazed when I said there is a large homeless population in Portland. What has perpetuated the idea that America is so equal abroad (I ran into the same state of mind in the Philippines)? Is it simply because it is seen as a superpower, therefore it must have it's shit together? I remember hearing many people in the Philippines talk about how America was the best country to immigrate to. Many times I wanted to tell them to do their homework and decide what is important to them (universal health care, low poverty rates, good education) before decided which country would be best.